Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
None
|
Bentley Systems Inc has not disclosed a formal process for governing its climate-related lobbying activities. The company describes its advocacy, noting that “Our Government Relations and Infrastructure Policy Advancement teams coordinate with key stakeholders from all markets, finance, insurance, industry associations, and executive government departments to transform and advance infrastructure policy” and that “the external policies and engagement that Bentley advocates for almost exclusively promote decarbonization and a green transition,” including efforts that “helped to shape the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024.” However, the company does not disclose any policy, review mechanism, or designated oversight body or individual responsible for ensuring that its lobbying aligns with its climate commitments, and it confirms that it “does not have a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement” while planning to adopt one “in the next two years.”
View Sources
|
E
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Bentley Systems provides only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. The company refers to engaging with policymakers at events such as COP28, running workshops with Indian government ministries, and participating in European Parliament events, indicating that it uses forums, workshops and trade-association channels to reach decision makers, but it does not identify which specific officials or bodies were approached or describe concrete methods such as submissions, letters or meetings. Its disclosures speak broadly about advancing digital transformation and infrastructure policy for sustainability, yet they do not name any particular climate policy, regulation or bill that the company sought to influence. Likewise, the outcomes it hopes to achieve are framed in general terms—promoting resilient infrastructure and better investment—without setting out specific legislative changes, targets or amendments it is advocating. Overall, the company reveals that it engages in policy discussions, but the absence of identifiable policies, detailed mechanisms and clear objectives leaves its lobbying transparency at a limited level.
|
D
|