AAK AB

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Strong AAK AB provides considerable detail about its climate-policy lobbying, identifying specific initiatives such as the “EU Deforestation Regulation,” “EU Taxonomy,” and other parts of the “EU Green Deal.” The company describes multiple methods of engagement, including “engagement via relevant industry bodies at European and national level,” “releasing a white paper on the EU Deforestation Regulation,” and “sending in responses and comments to the public consultations of the different legislative proposals,” and names its targets as “European and national policymakers.” It highlights its support for the legislation’s overall goals, explaining that it has “proposed alternative considerations due to ‘huge practical implications impacting cost, availability and access to the European market of specific groups of suppliers (smallholders).’” AAK AB also underscores that it is “aligned with the Paris Agreement,” and notes, “We are collaborating within our industry to make sure that the new regulation is implemented in a way that is practical and effective to fight deforestation at a global level.” While the company does not detail specific amendments or numeric policy targets, its statements show a clear position and rationale for its climate lobbying approach. 3
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
None AAK AB does not disclose any governance process specific to lobbying or policy advocacy; while the company notes that “Each year, we engage with key stakeholders and review upcoming legislation to understand what is important and to ensure we have the right level of ambition,” there is no explanation of how these reviews translate into a formal lobbying governance framework. There is no public commitment to align engagement activities with the goals of the Paris Agreement—“No, and we do not plan to have one in the next two years”—and we found no evidence of any policies, procedures, or oversight structures, such as a named individual or committee, responsible for monitoring and aligning either direct or indirect lobbying with the company’s climate strategy. 0