Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Moderate |
Next PLC discloses a defined internal process to manage how its policy engagement on climate is conducted and overseen, indicating moderate governance. The company explains that "engagement activities relating to the climate change agenda are centrally managed through the Product Legislation and Sustainable Development Department which reports directly to the Group Finance Director," and that "enquiries/correspondence that enter the business through other routes are passed to this team for review and management," demonstrating a mechanism to channel and screen lobbying-related interactions. Alignment with climate strategy is explicitly sought, as the process "ensures Next can deliver a common approach both internally and externally and ensure the approach is consistent with our overall climate change strategy." Oversight is clearly assigned: "The Head of Product Legislation and Sustainable Development… provides updates to the Audit Committee as a standing agenda item," while "the Board has delegated oversight of ESG activities to the Audit Committee," establishing a formal governance body that reviews these activities. The disclosure also notes that "an ESG Steering Group meets quarterly to oversee the delivery of our action plan and improvement roadmap," reinforcing internal monitoring. However, the company does not disclose any systematic review of the climate positions of its trade associations, nor does it describe corrective or escalation steps if misalignment is found, and it states "No" to having a public commitment to conduct engagement in line with the Paris Agreement. No independent lobbying audit or public reporting on alignment is provided. Therefore, while there is a documented process and named oversight that covers direct climate-related engagement, transparency on indirect lobbying and detailed monitoring outcomes is not disclosed.
View Sources
|
C |