Lobbying Governance
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| None |
No evidence found
View Sources
|
E |
Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| None |
No evidence found
View Sources
|
E |
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Limited |
Sands China provides minimal transparency on its climate lobbying efforts. It offers no insight into direct or indirect lobbying mechanisms or targets, instead describing operational collaborations such as “working hand-in-hand with each other to seek a carbon neutral exhibition venue” and efforts to “promote the upcoming 2022 MIECF in August as Macau's first carbon neutral exhibition.” While it references alignment with government frameworks—Macao’s net zero emissions ambitions, the central government’s 14th Five-Year Plan, the Environmental Protection Planning of Macao, and a Green Development and Carbon Neutrality MOU—it does not specify any specific policies, legislation, or regulations it has lobbied. The company articulates broad aspirations like “building a green Macao with a low carbon footprint” and achieving net zero emissions by 2050, but it does not identify any concrete policy outcomes sought through its engagements. Overall, Sands China’s disclosures lack clarity on the mechanisms, targets, and tangible outcomes of any climate-related lobbying activities.
|
D |