Lobbying Governance
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| None |
No evidence found
View Sources
|
E |
Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| None |
No evidence found
View Sources
|
E |
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| None |
Turkiye Petrol Rafinerileri AS (Tüpraş) offers virtually no transparency about its climate-related lobbying. The report references broad policy arenas such as the EU Green Deal and the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, yet it does not state that the company attempted to influence these or any other specific measures. Likewise, while it notes activities such as “Tüpraş participated in the COP27 conference held in Sharm El-Sheikh in Egypt” and involvement in associations like Hydrogen Europe, it provides no detail on the mechanisms—letters, meetings, submissions—or the policymakers that might have been targeted. The disclosure also fails to describe any concrete legislative or regulatory outcomes the company hopes to achieve; ambitions like becoming “a carbon-neutral energy company by 2050” are strategic goals, not lobbying objectives. As a result, readers are left without evidence of which climate policies, if any, the company seeks to influence, how it engages with decision-makers, or the specific results it is pursuing.
|
E |