Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | NIKE Inc. provides an unusually full picture of its climate-policy advocacy. It names multiple distinct measures it has engaged on, including the “U.S. Department of State Clean Energy Demand Initiative,” USAID’s “Vietnam Low Emission Energy Program (V-LEEP)” and the associated renewable-energy Direct Power Purchase Agreement pilot, the U.S. Department of Energy’s “Better Buildings Challenge,” and support for an Oregon carbon cap-and-trade bill, among others. The company is equally clear on how it seeks to influence these policies, citing direct meetings such as “At COP26, NIKE executives met with government officials,” collaborative work with “the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Vietnam Low Emission Energy Program (V-LEEP),” coalition activity like “joining 330 companies in 2020 to call on the U.S. Congress to include long-term climate solutions in future economic recovery plans,” and ongoing engagement with specific agencies such as the Vietnam Ministry of Industry and Trade and the Electricity Regulatory Authority of Vietnam. NIKE also spells out the results it wants to achieve: finalisation of the Vietnamese DPPA so that it can “secure renewable electricity for nearly 100 % of our owned and operated spaces in Vietnam,” mechanisms to manage cost risk within that scheme, a U.S. economic-recovery package that contains “long-term climate solutions,” passage of competitive clean-energy market rules, and facility-level goals like a “reduce energy intensity by 20 % by 2025.” By linking these defined policy objectives to clearly identified lobbying channels and targets, the company demonstrates a high level of transparency across all facets of its climate-related lobbying. | 4 |