Frasers Property Ltd

Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
None Frasers Property Ltd provides detailed disclosures on its sustainability and ESG oversight, noting that “the Sustainability Working Group reports to the CEO and meets quarterly” and that the Board’s Sustainability and Risk Management Committee “oversee the Group’s risk management and sustainability framework and policies.” It also describes its indirect policy engagement through industry bodies, stating that “REITAS serves as the representative advocate for the Singapore REIT (‘S-REIT’) sector, facilitating member engagement in policy consultations.” However, we found no evidence of any governance process, policy‐alignment review, monitoring procedure, or named individual or committee responsible for overseeing or aligning the company’s direct or indirect lobbying activities—climate‐related or otherwise—suggesting that the company does not disclose a lobbying governance framework.

View Sources

E
Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
Limited Frasers Property Ltd provides only limited transparency around its climate-related lobbying. The company refers to Singapore’s national net-zero target and to its involvement in industry consultations through the REIT Association of Singapore, but it does not identify any specific pieces of legislation, regulations, or rule-makings it has tried to influence. Its description of lobbying channels is confined to broad statements such as a wish to “explore ways to intensify private-public partnerships” and to its membership in REITAS, noting that “FLCT plays an active role as a member of REITAS, participating in industry events… and relevant surveys” without naming the government bodies or policymakers engaged. Likewise, the company articulates only high-level aspirations—such as the desire for “harmonised standards” and achievement of “net-zero carbon by 2050”—and offers no concrete policy positions or outcomes it seeks to secure. This leaves readers with little clarity on which climate policies the company engages, how it seeks to influence them, or what specific changes it hopes to achieve.

D