Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
None
|
Ratos AB provides extensive detail on sustainability and compliance—“The board holds the overall responsibility for Aibel’s sustainability performance,” Aibel reports, and “Aibel has a dedicated Ethics and Compliance department and a fully integrated compliance programme developed through a robust organisational culture and a clear directive from the top,” while Semcon outlines that “Semcon has a whistleblower policy and a whistleblower reporting system”—but no disclosure addresses internal mechanisms, oversight structures, monitoring, or accountability for either direct or indirect lobbying activities, nor any procedures to align or review lobbying with its climate or policy positions, and we found no evidence of any individual or formal body tasked with overseeing lobbying governance.
View Sources
|
E
|
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
Limited
|
Aibel offers only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. Its reporting refers broadly to working on electrification and renewable energy projects that are “fuelled by the European Green Deal policies” and highlights initiatives such as “Equinor’s Snøhvit Future project [which] will decarbonise the Hammerfest LNG plant through electrification,” yet it does not identify any specific pieces of legislation or regulatory proposals it has sought to influence. The company provides no description of how it lobbies—there is no mention of letters, meetings, public consultations, trade-association activity, or the government bodies or officials it engages. The outcomes it references are high-level project objectives, for example that the Hammerfest project will “contribute to reducing CO₂ emissions by 850,000 tonnes per year,” rather than concrete policy changes it hopes to secure. As a result, the disclosures convey general support for the energy transition but do not transparently explain any targeted lobbying activity, mechanisms, or desired policy outcomes.
|
D
|