Gold Road Resources Ltd

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited Gold Road Resources discloses only limited information about its climate-policy lobbying. It does identify one concrete policy area—the Australian Government’s Safeguard Mechanism for large industrial emitters—and notes that it is “monitoring” forthcoming Nature Positive legislation, indicating some awareness of the policy landscape, but it does not describe any other climate measures it has engaged on or confirm that these are the only ones. The company states that its Board has engaged with the joint-venture partner’s board on renewable energy at the Gruyere mine, yet it gives no detail on how it approaches government decision-makers, whether through meetings, submissions, letters, or membership of industry associations, nor does it name any specific public-sector targets. Likewise, the firm outlines high-level ambitions such as reaching net-zero emissions by 2050 and pursuing renewable energy projects, but provides no clear statement of the legislative or regulatory changes it is advocating to help achieve those aims. In the absence of concrete mechanisms, identifiable lobbying targets, or clearly articulated policy outcomes, the company’s transparency on climate lobbying remains minimal. 1
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited Gold Road Resources Ltd has a limited governance process for climate-related lobbying, relying exclusively on indirect engagement through industry associations without formal oversight or monitoring. The company explicitly states “We do not make donations to political parties or undertake any direct lobbying activities,” and notes that “The industry associations we are members of represent our voice along with the rest of the industry, in their political engagement,” which indicates dependence on third-party channels for policy influence. It also affirms that personnel “participate in, and contribute to, various industry association’s working groups on issues … in line with the Company’s strategy and commitment to be net zero by 2050,” but the company does not disclose any formal policy, review process, or sign-off mechanism to ensure these associations’ positions align with its climate objectives. We found no evidence of a named individual or committee specifically overseeing lobbying alignment or any structured monitoring of association activities. 1