Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
None
|
Glory Ltd provides detailed processes for ensuring its engagement activities are aligned with its climate change strategy, noting that it “participated in the Ministry of the Environment’s SBT Development Support Project” and has used the Green Value Chain Platform since FY2014 to “visualize and control greenhouse gas emissions” with the General Affairs Division serving as “the point of contact for all involved to ensure all initiatives and/or activities are aligned with Glory’s climate change strategy.” However, we found no evidence of any governance process for lobbying: there is no description of oversight, monitoring, or alignment of direct or indirect lobbying activities, no named individual or committee responsible for lobbying governance, and no policies or review procedures to ensure that any policy advocacy is consistent with the company’s climate objectives.
View Sources
|
E
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Glory Ltd offers only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. It indicates that it engaged with Japanese policymakers when government guidelines on CO₂ reduction targets were revised and that it adjusted its own targets to align with those guidelines, but it does not name the specific law, regulation, or programme involved, merely alluding to the existence of government “guidelines.” The description of lobbying activity is also high-level: the company says it “engaged with policymakers,” yet gives no detail on how that engagement was conducted—no meetings, submissions, letters, or industry-association channels are identified, and no specific ministries or officials are named. Finally, the disclosure sets out a broad ambition of reaching net-zero CO₂ emissions by FY2050 and of aligning targets with government expectations, but it stops short of explaining what concrete policy changes it seeks to promote or oppose. Collectively, these gaps mean that stakeholders receive only a cursory picture of the company’s lobbying objectives, methods, and policy focus.
|
D
|