Fuyo General Lease Co Ltd

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Sign Up

Direct Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
Comprehensive	Fuyo General Lease provides a highly detailed picture of its climate-related advocacy. It specifies the concrete policy files it has worked on, including Japan’s Nationally Determined Contribution, measures to expand electricity-grid capacity for large-scale renewable integration, promotion of corporate power-purchase agreements, and the introduction of a domestic carbon-pricing scheme. The company also explains exactly how and with whom it engages: it works through the Japan Climate Leaders Partnership, holds direct discussions with the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and has presented a dedicated position paper to the Prime Minister—demonstrating both indirect association-based channels and direct outreach to clearly identified decision-makers. Finally, it is transparent about the concrete results it seeks, such as higher national emissions-reduction targets, financial incentives for early greenhouse-gas abatement, and policy frameworks that accelerate renewable deployment and corporate PPAs. Collectively, this information shows comprehensive disclosure across the policies targeted, the mechanisms used and the outcomes pursued.	4

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
Limited	Fuyo General Lease Co Ltd states that it has a “public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement,” simply noting “Yes” when asked if this exists. However, the company does not disclose any formal oversight structure—such as a named individual or board committee—responsible for reviewing or approving lobbying activities, nor does it describe any processes for monitoring or aligning its direct or indirect lobbying with its climate commitments. We found no evidence of a policy outlining how its advocacy is managed or any mechanisms for ensuring consistency with its Paris-aligned stance. This indicates limited lobbying governance, with a commitment in principle but no detailed accountability or procedural framework.	1