Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
Limited
|
Schindler Holding AG has embedded sustainability into its governance structure—asserting that "Sustainability is a Board matter as per our Organizational Regulations" and establishing a CEO-chaired Sustainability Committee that "leads and controls progress on sustainability, including climate‐related risks"—and it affirms a "public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement". However, the company does not disclose any internal mechanisms for overseeing or reviewing lobbying: there is no named individual or formal body responsible for lobbying alignment, no described process for monitoring or managing direct or indirect advocacy activities, and no indication of criteria for engaging with or exiting trade associations whose positions might conflict with its climate objectives.
View Sources
|
1
|
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
Limited
|
Schindler Holding AG provides only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. It indicates that it engages on “elevator industry codes that form part of national legislation,” but does not identify any specific bills, regulations or jurisdictions involved, so readers cannot tell exactly which climate-relevant policies are being addressed. The company explains that it channels its views indirectly through trade bodies such as the European Lift Association, National Elevator Industry Inc. (NEII) in the United States and the Lift and Escalator Contractors Association in Hong Kong; however, it stops short of naming the government agencies or lawmakers these associations approach or describing how Schindler itself participates. Finally, the disclosure offers no clear statement of what policy changes or outcomes it is seeking beyond a broad intention to help customers obtain green-building credits, leaving its policy positions and objectives opaque.
|
1
|