Azbil Corp

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited Azbil Corp provides only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. It indicates that it participates in collective initiatives such as the Japan Climate Initiative and Keidanren’s Challenge Zero, signalling indirect engagement with policymakers, but it does not describe how it uses these forums—such as meetings, submissions, or letters—nor does it name the government bodies or individual officials it targets. The company references broad policy areas, noting its support for the Japanese government’s carbon-neutrality agenda and citing domestic legislation like the Act on Rationalizing Energy Use and the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures, yet it does not clarify whether it sought to influence these specific laws or any other identifiable bill or regulation. Similarly, the objectives of its engagement are stated only in general terms—supporting carbon neutrality and encouraging lower CO₂ emissions—without spelling out concrete legislative changes, amendments, or targets it is advocating. Taken together, the disclosures reveal participation in climate-policy discussions but fall short of detailing the particular policies, lobbying channels and explicit outcomes pursued. 1
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Moderate Azbil Corp has implemented a structured process to govern its indirect climate-related lobbying by third parties, explaining that “When reviewing participation in external organizations, we regularly examine whether there is a significant contradiction with our thinking and direction, and if there is a large deviation, we consider withdrawing.” These reviews are “deliberated and decided in the Management Meeting when a judgment is required,” and the company “shares information with our chief risk officer (CRO) with the approval of the aG director in charge of environmental protection innovation, and also report to the Management Meeting,” which demonstrates clear oversight and sign-off mechanisms for its association memberships. However, Azbil does not disclose a corresponding framework for managing its own direct lobbying activities in line with its climate commitments, nor does it publish a dedicated climate-lobbying audit or review outlining how it monitors policy engagement beyond participation in the Japan Climate Initiative. 2