FP Corp

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Sign Up

Direct Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
Limited	FP Corporation offers only limited insight into its climate-policy lobbying. It references Japan’s Energy Saving Act and the Global Warming Countermeasures Act and points to its participation in alliances such as CLOMA and J4CE that address marine plastic waste and the circular economy, but it does not explain what influence it sought over these laws or any other named regulation. The company describes general activities—sharing information on recycling technologies, facilitating business matching, and collaborating with research institutions—yet it never identifies the concrete mechanisms it uses to lobby policymakers or the specific government bodies it approaches. Likewise, the objectives it cites remain aspirational, such as promoting “sustainable plastic use,” reducing plastic waste, and building a “fully circular recycling system,” without translating these ambitions into measurable legislative or regulatory outcomes. As a result, the disclosures reveal broad intentions and memberships but lack the detail needed to understand which policies the company tries to shape, how it engages decision-makers, or the precise changes it is pursuing.	1

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
Limited	FP Corp’s disclosures indicate limited governance around climate lobbying, consisting solely of a “public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement,” but the company does not disclose any mechanism for reviewing or monitoring these lobbying activities, nor does it identify a specific individual or formal body responsible for oversight or describe how it aligns either its direct advocacy or its participation in trade or industry associations with its stated climate policy.	1