Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Moderate |
Omron Corp. demonstrates a defined process for aligning its indirect lobbying through industry associations with its climate goals, for example by stating that it “regularly review[s] the campaigns of industry associations to ensure that there is no significant conflict between their ideas and ours,” and that if they “identify significant misalignments … we will move forward to take escalation steps,” which may include “issuing an official statement to distance ourselves from the association/initiative,” “withdrawing funding,” or “ending membership.” They further report that “in fiscal 2023, there were no significant misalignments found with the trade associations we were in,” indicating active monitoring and management of these relationships. Oversight of these activities is embedded within their broader sustainability governance, with “monitoring and oversight by the board” and reporting through “the Sustainability Committee and Executive Council,” and annual discussion of progress with “the Board of Directors.” However, the company does not disclose specific procedures for ensuring that its direct lobbying efforts themselves are aligned with its climate-change policy, nor does it name a dedicated individual or committee responsible solely for overseeing lobbying alignment.
View Sources
|
C |