Lobbying Governance
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Moderate |
Entel’s disclosure indicates limited climate lobbying governance, relying chiefly on indirect monitoring and a broad public commitment without structured oversight or proactive management. The company affirms “Yes” when asked if it has “a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement,” which suggests a baseline pledge to align its advocacy. It states that “Entel is more reactive than proactive since this is not seen as a public policy area that has the potential to create significant risk for the Company” and that it “has not taken a leadership nor an opposing role in terms of the development of climate change policy in Chile and Perú.” Instead, its main strategy is to “monitor the positions of the associations in which it is a member, as well as relevant public policy, such as the NDC and climate strategy of the Chilean government, to ensure that these memberships are consistent with the climate change strategy of the Company.” While this shows some mechanism for indirect alignment with climate goals, the company does not disclose any named individual or formal body overseeing these activities, nor does it describe a formal review procedure or any direct engagement process to govern its own climate-related lobbying efforts.
View Sources
|
C |