Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Limited |
Sansan Inc. provides minimal insight into how it governs its lobbying or broader policy-engagement activities; the only disclosure indicates that it selects external partners whose objectives do not conflict with its own climate efforts, noting that "The external organizations funded by the Company are organizations that are working to ensure climate change and biodiversity by planting trees, and there is no potential conflict with the Company's efforts and plans." This statement shows that the company considers alignment when choosing organizations, which suggests some attention to consistency between external engagement and its climate goals. However, the company does not explain any formal review mechanism, monitoring schedule, or escalation procedure, and "No, and we do not plan to have one in the next two years" when asked about a public commitment to align engagement with the Paris Agreement underscores the absence of a structured policy. There is no disclosure of a responsible individual or board committee, no discussion of how direct lobbying is controlled, and no indication that trade-association positions are assessed or addressed. Consequently, the governance framework appears limited to an informal assurance of alignment, with no transparent oversight or detailed process publicly described.
View Sources
|
D |