Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| None |
No evidence found.
|
0
|
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| None |
The evidence provided does not disclose any governance processes or structures specifically related to climate lobbying alignment. While it extensively discusses stewardship principles, monitoring of portfolio companies, and voting policies, these are focused on investment management and corporate governance rather than climate lobbying. For example, the document mentions "continuous monitoring of listed portfolio companies in which equity investments have been made" and "participation in voting and disclosure of voting activities," but these activities are not tied to climate lobbying governance. Additionally, the escalation matrix and conflict of interest management processes described are related to investment decisions and stewardship activities, not lobbying alignment. There is no mention of direct or indirect lobbying activities, trade association alignment, or oversight mechanisms for climate lobbying. Therefore, the evidence does not meet the criteria for climate lobbying governance disclosure.
|
0
|